How risky is eating red meat? New papers provoke controversy

Eating red meat is linked to cancer and heart disease, but are the risks big enough to give up burgers and steak?

Posted: Sep 30, 2019 9:53 PM

NEW YORK (AP) — Eating red meat is linked to cancer and heart disease, but are the risks big enough to give up burgers and steak?

A team of international researchers says probably not, contradicting established advice. In a series of papers published Monday, the researchers say the increased risks are small and uncertain and that cutting back likely wouldn’t be worth it for people who enjoy meat.

Their conclusions were swiftly attacked by a group of prominent U.S. scientists who took the unusual step of trying to stop publication until their criticisms were addressed.

The new work does not say red meat and processed meats like hot dogs and bacon are healthy or that people should eat more of them. The reviews of past studies generally support the ties to cancer, heart disease and other bad health outcomes. But the authors say the evidence is weak, and that there’s not much certainty meat is really the culprit, since other diet and lifestyle factors could be at play.

Most people who understand the magnitude of the risks would say “Thanks very much, but I’m going to keep eating my meat,” said co-author Dr. Gordon Guyatt of McMaster University in Canada.

It’s the latest example of how divisive nutrition research has become, with its uncertainties leaving the door open for conflicting advice. Critics say findings often aren’t backed by strong evidence. Defenders counter that nutrition studies can rarely be conclusive because of the difficulty of measuring the effects of any single food, but that methods have improved.

“What we need to do is look at the weight of evidence — that’s what courts of law use,” said Dr. Walter Willett, a professor of nutrition at Harvard University who was among those calling for the papers’ publication to be postponed.

Willett, who has led studies tying meat to bad health outcomes, also said the reviews do not consider the particularly pronounced benefits of switching from red meat to vegetarian options.

The journal, Annals of Internal Medicine, defended the work and said the request to have it pulled before publication is not how scientific discourse is supposed to happen. Guyatt called the attempt to halt publication “silly.”

In the papers, the authors sought to gauge the potential impact of eating less meat, noting the average of two to four servings a week eaten in North America and Western Europe. They said the evidence for cutting back wasn’t compelling. For example, they found that cutting three servings a week would result in seven fewer cancer deaths per 1,000 people.

Based on the analyses, a panel of the international researchers said people do not have to cut back for health reasons. But they note their own advice is weak and that they didn’t take into account other factors, such as animal welfare and the toll meat production has on the environment.

There was dissent even among the authors; three of the 14 panelist said they support reducing red and processed meats. A co-author of one of the reviews is also among those who called for the papers not to be published.

Those who pushed to delay publication also questioned why certain studies were included or excluded in the reviews.

Another critic of the research, Harvard’s Dr. Frank Hu, noted that about a third of American adults eat at least one serving of red meat a day. He said the benefits of cutting back would be larger for those who eat such high amounts.

Still, other researchers have criticized nutrition research for producing weak and conflicting findings. Dr. John Ioannidis, a professor of medicine at Stanford University, said advice based on weak evidence can distract from clearer, more effective messages, such as limiting how much we eat. He was not involved in the study or the protest.

As for his own diet, Guyatt said he no longer thinks red or processed meats have significant health risks. But he said he still avoids them out of habit, and for animal welfare and environmental reasons.

___

The Associated Press Health and Science Department receives support from the Howard Hughes Medical Institute’s Department of Science Education. The AP is solely responsible for all content.

Terre Haute
Clear
73° wxIcon
Hi: 76° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 73°
Robinson
Scattered Clouds
72° wxIcon
Hi: 72° Lo: 50°
Feels Like: 72°
Indianapolis
Broken Clouds
71° wxIcon
Hi: 75° Lo: 53°
Feels Like: 71°
Rockville
Scattered Clouds
68° wxIcon
Hi: 77° Lo: 50°
Feels Like: 68°
Casey
Few Clouds
72° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 72°
Brazil
Clear
73° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 50°
Feels Like: 73°
Marshall
Clear
73° wxIcon
Hi: 75° Lo: 50°
Feels Like: 73°
Clear & Cool
WTHI Planner
WTHI Temps
WTHI Radar

WTHI Events

 

Illinois Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 7 p.m. CT)

Confirmed Cases: 184522

Reported Deaths: 7723
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Cook1072474897
Lake12089440
DuPage11558510
Kane9239298
Will8650339
Winnebago3688125
St. Clair3655156
McHenry2961114
Madison222273
Kankakee168668
Rock Island160531
Champaign154719
Unassigned1347197
Peoria134135
Kendall129123
Sangamon103733
DeKalb85029
Boone73523
Jackson65019
McLean57215
LaSalle56020
Macon48923
Adams4454
Randolph4357
Coles40119
Tazewell3888
Ogle3775
Clinton34917
Williamson3415
Stephenson3186
Whiteside31316
Union30321
Grundy2825
Monroe27813
Knox2621
Iroquois2497
Vermilion2152
Henry2071
Morgan2035
Cass20211
Jefferson19217
Warren1830
Lee1482
Montgomery1477
Bureau1442
Marion1380
Macoupin1373
Franklin1320
McDonough12815
Perry1261
Effingham1161
Christian1154
Jo Daviess1131
Saline1131
Douglas1022
Woodford983
Livingston922
Pulaski910
Logan860
Jersey701
Mercer700
Clark680
Shelby601
Fayette583
Washington580
White580
Bond572
Johnson570
Moultrie550
Jasper537
Wayne501
Menard480
Piatt480
Cumberland472
Carroll463
Gallatin450
Lawrence420
Mason420
Ford411
Alexander360
Hancock341
Massac340
Wabash320
De Witt300
Crawford290
Edgar260
Fulton260
Hamilton230
Marshall210
Greene200
Hardin170
Schuyler170
Clay140
Brown130
Edwards130
Pike130
Richland130
Scott110
Henderson90
Pope80
Putnam80
Calhoun70
Stark70
Out of IL00

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 8 p.m. ET)

Confirmed Cases: 68433

Reported Deaths: 2980
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Marion14863719
Lake7101271
Elkhart459777
Allen3635158
St. Joseph315479
Hamilton2513104
Cass17519
Hendricks1750105
Vanderburgh172612
Johnson1652118
Porter119539
Tippecanoe110311
Clark108145
Madison84765
LaPorte83829
Kosciusko81912
Howard81065
Bartholomew74347
Marshall74222
Floyd69444
Monroe68630
Delaware63852
Noble63728
Boone63546
Dubois62612
Hancock62337
Jackson5524
LaGrange54210
Warrick51630
Shelby51126
Grant49629
Vigo47410
Dearborn46528
Morgan42532
Henry36118
Clinton3573
White34710
Montgomery34321
Lawrence32827
Wayne3179
Decatur31432
Harrison29422
Miami2582
Scott25010
Daviess24619
Greene23934
Franklin22410
DeKalb2224
Putnam2228
Jennings21012
Jasper2082
Gibson2004
Steuben2003
Ripley1887
Perry17212
Starke1657
Orange16424
Wabash1613
Posey1580
Fayette1557
Jefferson1492
Whitley1486
Fulton1462
Carroll1452
Wells1342
Knox1310
Huntington1183
Washington1161
Spencer1143
Newton11010
Tipton1075
Randolph1034
Clay975
Jay820
Adams812
Rush794
Owen781
Sullivan761
Pulaski721
Brown701
Fountain632
Benton600
Blackford532
Ohio514
Pike460
Parke451
Switzerland430
Crawford420
Martin420
Vermillion380
Union320
Warren191
Unassigned0200