STREAMING NOW: Watch Now

Priyanka Chopra: The complicated feminist

"Feminism is just saying give me opportunities without judging me for the decisions that I make, the same fr...

Posted: Dec 7, 2018 2:26 AM
Updated: Dec 7, 2018 2:26 AM

"Feminism is just saying give me opportunities without judging me for the decisions that I make, the same freedom that men have enjoyed for so many centuries," Priyanka Chopra explained in an interview last October.

And for the most part, Chopra has done just that, using her stardom to propel from Bollywood movie star to an international icon -- a rise that some would call ruthlessly careerist and others unabashedly feminist.

Celebrities

Priyanka Chopra

Arts and entertainment

Asia

Celebrity and pop culture

Continents and regions

Demographic groups

Families and children

Females (demographic group)

Feminism

Gender equality

India

Marriage

Population and demographics

Sex and gender issues

Society

South Asia

Weddings and engagements

Part of this controversy stems from the fact that Chopra, a powerful actress, is full of all the complications and contradictions that surround ambitious women. She has championed feminism in one breath, but denounced burning bras in others. She has talked about the need for diversity when it comes to her own career in the United States and yet warmly feted the man whose Hindu nationalist party is accused of enabling the transformation of India from a secular to a Hindu state.

And these same divisions seem to exist regarding her latest endeavor: marriage. Last week, the actress of more than 50 films and star of the recently canceled "Quantico," wed beau Nick Jonas in a multi-episodic wedding, which featured a 70-foot (yes, 70) veil and ceremonies in a palace in Jodhpur and various other venues in India.

To many, it was the feminist marriage of globalist dreams. At a time when America's xenophobic voices are loudest, Chopra appeared as the glowing exception to the nationalist stay-in-your-lane rhetoric that pervades politics everywhere. After all, Indian starlets with a net worth of $28 million don't always marry boy-band superstars from New Jersey, but that is just what happened on December 1, 2018.

It all began with Twitter DM's; he messaged her, and she offered up a phone number, because "her team" could see the messages. It was a power-move, the sort one would expect of a male celebrity whose entourage vets which preening women would get his attention -- except that it had been appropriated by a woman, and a brown woman to boot.

There are a lot more details of just this sort: the mere five minutes she could spare to get a first drink with Jonas while a car and flight waited to carry her off to India, all of it establishing her dominance and his lovelorn devotion.

In Chopra, then, we have the ultimate lean-in love. A brown Indian woman, one of the first to have exported her stardom across the globe from India to America, engages a younger boy-band crooner in a cinematic courtship, and never once apologizes for it. The wedding was thus expectedly triumphal and lavish, fitting into Priyanka's confession of working hard to "spoil herself."

The championing of this go-get-what-you-want-in-love ethic is not just a speculative read into Chopra's marital shenanigans; it is a philosophy that she is quite literally investing in. Next year she says she will be helping launch Bumble, the online dating app, into the Indian market because, "It's the idea of it that I love for India," as she told Vogue recently. "It empowers girls to take control of their futures. You want a career, go online; pursue the person you want to meet. Choose the kind of guy you like."

But for others, including some women, Chopra's get-ahead-how-you-can feminism is unacceptable. Days after the wedding, The Cut published a piece (which it took down on Wednesday) labeling her a "global scam" and alleging that the younger Jonas was "trapped" in the marriage -- an unwitting part of a strategic career move passing as a marriage and ambition as love. The piece also took nasty potshots at the length and lavishness of the celebrations, believing that they were a Chopra special rather than the usual traditional stuff that they were. That essay's vitriol provoked angry responses from brother Joe Jonas and his fiancée, star Sophie Turner.

That sort of critique of Chopra-branded feminism is misplaced, because it fails to target the real holes in her feminist story. A better critique could focus, for instance, on the role she played in "Quantico." Alex Parrish, the FBI agent, may have been brown, but her agenda, catching terrorists who were often foreign, was a classic case of the American exceptionalist heroine -- feminist power wed to the security state. Parrish was a woman wielding the power of America's terror industrial complex.

The role can, in fact, be considered a stand-in for the allegiance that America now demands of anyone who wants to make it in this land of Trump and money, a heartfelt rendition of the American mantra that deems state power as always good and threats as (mostly) foreign. The "diversity" actress can cross over to the mainstream if she sings it loud and clear, and Chopra has done just that and been rewarded significantly.

Celebrity feminism, related as it is to corporate feminism -- the buying of this or that in the name of empowerment -- is a brittle beast. Its hollow insides belie its emphasis on the feel-good over the do-good, and female empowerment as part of a clever soft sell. Chopra followed its rules; in an early interview about "Quantico," she insisted the show was about "empowerment," although not in the "bra-burning sense" given the latter's fail status in the marketing of feminist icons.

Chopra is not perfect -- and neither is her feminism. She is, however, a representative of what is possible for women if they set about using everything they have to get everything they want. Chopra has done just that, using everything, looks and love, strategic placement and inventive self-creation, in the service of the goal of becoming a star that shines not only in India but also in America.

Distilled to its essence, hers is a feminism of not giving a damn, grabbing all the power you can, marrying the younger man, wearing the crazy veil and broadcasting for the world to see. In our global moment of reckoning on women's rights, such fantastic audacity is welcome.

"It is a powerful time to be an artist," she remarked earlier this year. Who knows about artists, but it is certainly a very powerful time to be Chopra.

Terre Haute
Clear
33° wxIcon
Hi: 49° Lo: 29°
Feels Like: 33°
Robinson
Clear
30° wxIcon
Hi: 49° Lo: 27°
Feels Like: 30°
Indianapolis
Clear
36° wxIcon
Hi: 48° Lo: 30°
Feels Like: 30°
Rockville
Clear
33° wxIcon
Hi: 49° Lo: 29°
Feels Like: 33°
Casey
Clear
39° wxIcon
Hi: 48° Lo: 29°
Feels Like: 36°
Brazil
Clear
33° wxIcon
Hi: 50° Lo: 29°
Feels Like: 33°
Marshall
Clear
33° wxIcon
Hi: 49° Lo: 28°
Feels Like: 33°
Clear and cold evening.
WTHI Planner
WTHI Temps
WTHI Radar

WTHI Events

 

Illinois Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 7 p.m. CT)

Cases: 705063

Reported Deaths: 12685
CountyCasesDeaths
Cook2988706476
DuPage44035777
Will37864560
Lake36375629
Kane31136461
Winnebago18509262
Madison14013242
McHenry13979156
St. Clair12956257
Champaign1061957
Sangamon993799
Peoria8880129
Rock Island8444134
Kankakee8438103
McLean819054
Tazewell6625102
Macon6370131
Kendall613347
LaSalle5975133
DeKalb488147
Adams465148
Boone383633
Vermilion380150
Whiteside3668109
Williamson351080
Coles326458
Clinton324761
Ogle279135
Knox275462
Effingham269621
Grundy269418
Jackson261136
Henry260615
Marion241751
Stephenson241534
Livingston221226
Randolph218826
Morgan215636
Macoupin211517
Bureau207842
Monroe202045
Franklin199525
Lee196334
Christian185443
Jefferson183159
Woodford170627
Logan165813
Fayette165029
Iroquois163426
McDonough156240
Fulton141611
Shelby135026
Douglas132716
Jersey120924
Union116428
Montgomery112619
Crawford109813
Saline109025
Jo Daviess106217
Warren106220
Perry105423
Carroll104724
Bond102110
Lawrence101710
Pike99427
Cass94823
Hancock94012
Wayne87633
Moultrie87510
Clay81820
Greene80929
Clark78620
Edgar77815
Piatt7645
Richland73819
Ford73222
Mercer73010
Mason70219
Johnson7016
Washington6712
Jasper63411
Cumberland60916
De Witt60017
White5878
Massac5833
Wabash5348
Menard4571
Unassigned4270
Pulaski4072
Marshall3926
Hamilton3783
Brown3203
Henderson2790
Schuyler2661
Alexander2522
Stark2523
Putnam2420
Calhoun2310
Scott2310
Edwards2233
Gallatin1883
Hardin1461
Pope971
Out of IL110

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 8 p.m. ET)

Cases: 324537

Reported Deaths: 5594
CountyCasesDeaths
Marion44186858
Lake28094462
Allen18660301
Elkhart17663230
St. Joseph17256234
Hamilton13612170
Vanderburgh10028121
Tippecanoe896729
Porter855386
Johnson6718169
Hendricks6412158
Vigo625889
Monroe550450
Clark531078
Madison5239122
Delaware5075103
LaPorte481196
Kosciusko475941
Howard364177
Bartholomew335365
Warrick335372
Floyd329478
Wayne325678
Marshall311846
Cass303931
Grant287150
Hancock272957
Noble264946
Henry256437
Boone255054
Dubois245631
Dearborn228231
Jackson226334
Morgan221243
Gibson194926
Knox193021
Shelby192656
Clinton185421
DeKalb183932
Lawrence183849
Wabash172821
Adams172422
Miami170815
Daviess163145
Fayette153734
Steuben153414
Jasper151713
Montgomery149327
Harrison147624
LaGrange146131
Ripley145815
Whitley142314
Huntington133510
Decatur132543
Putnam131128
White131022
Wells130130
Clay130023
Randolph128121
Posey125816
Jefferson124116
Scott114520
Greene106053
Sullivan102716
Jay101913
Starke95022
Jennings90414
Spencer8908
Fulton87519
Perry85121
Fountain8228
Washington8127
Franklin73427
Carroll71913
Orange70028
Vermillion6607
Owen6468
Tipton60327
Parke6026
Newton57812
Rush5708
Blackford56612
Pike52719
Pulaski41815
Martin3705
Benton3643
Brown3574
Crawford3081
Union2782
Switzerland2655
Warren2562
Ohio2387
Unassigned0266