Democrats pop the movement's balloon

The recent primary losses are not the first time ...

Posted: Aug 14, 2018 2:50 PM
Updated: Aug 14, 2018 2:50 PM

The recent primary losses are not the first time the air went out of the movement-left's visions of inevitability. It also happened during the 2016 presidential primaries when -- for all of Bernie Sanders' massive rallies and coverage by an obsessive media -- the independent from Vermont lost to Hillary Clinton. And he lost by a not insignificant margin of nearly 3.7 million votes.

The problem with left-wing movements isn't so much "the left-wing" as it is the "movements." Movements sometimes have a totalitarian edge that cannot abide dissent, or even a hint of it. They're "us" versus "them." In the case of left-wing movements, the "them" is often fellow Democrats.

Government and public administration

Political organizations

Politics

US Democratic Party

US political parties

Al Gore

Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez

Bernie Sanders

Business and industry sectors

Business, economy and trade

Donald Trump

Elections (by type)

Elections and campaigns

Government health insurance

Health and medical

Health care

Health insurance

Hillary Clinton

Insurance

Medicare

Political candidates

Political endorsements

Political Figures - US

Primaries and caucuses

Ralph Nader

Single-payer health insurance

Social assistance and welfare

Society

US Federal elections

US Presidential elections

2016 Presidential election

You saw that way back in 1972, when Sanders was running for Vermont governor. As Mother Jones reported, a fellow Vermont activist named Greg Guma asked Sanders the innocent question of why he should vote for him.

Sanders' response: "If you didn't come to work for the movement, you came for the wrong reasons. I don't care who you are; I don't need you."

The painful reality for the Democratic Party is that much of the movement left doesn't necessarily care whether Democrats win. Recall the election of 2000, when Green Party candidate Ralph Nader siphoned off enough liberal votes to deliver victory to Republican George W. Bush.

Democrat Al Gore and Bush had been running neck and neck. Despite reports that Republican groups were running ads for Nader, significant voices on the left were urging liberals to vote for Nader.

Why? Here is how Barbara Ehrenreich put it in The Nation: "What I fear most about a Gore victory — yes, I said victory — is its almost certainly debilitating effect on progressives and their organizations."

She wasn't alone. Celebrity agitator Michael Moore was bouncing on and off stages in liberal cities urging audiences to vote for Nader.

"A vote for Gore is a vote for Bush," he bellowed. "If they both believe in the same thing, wouldn't you want the original rather than the copy?"

Shortly after Donald Trump won in 2016, I attended Moore's one-man Broadway show. He opened with "How the f—- did this happen? The second time in the last 16 years we got the most votes!" I nearly choked.

Fast forward to 2018. Alexandria Ocasio-Cortez, a "Democratic Socialist," set off a political earthquake when she dethroned a powerful Democrat in a congressional primary. The district covers parts of the Bronx and Queens.

Ocasio-Cortez became an instant media and left-wing sensation. Articulate and charming, she became the subject of obsessive speculation. But thrust onto major talk shows, she revealed some serious holes in her understanding of national issues.

Whatever, Ocasio won fair and square, defeating an incumbent who apparently forgot to campaign. An ardent Sanders follower, she then retreated into the movement mentality.

The defeated Joe Crowley, who immediately conceded and promised to support her, came under attack for not doing something he couldn't do without taking extreme steps -- remove his name from the ballot on a small-party line. "Alexandria," Crowley tweeted, "the race is over and Democrats need to come together. I've made my support for you clear and the fact that I'm not running."

But Ocasio-Cortez took the movement path, putting her energies into helping defeat, not Republicans in November, but "establishment" Democrats in the primaries. So she and Sanders jetted around the country, endorsing left-wingers sure to lose in a general election.

Democratic primary voters generally ignored them. In the Democratic primary for governor of Michigan, Abdul El-Sayed lost to the establishment choice, former state Sen. Gretchen Whitmer, by more than 20 percentage points. In Kansas, a former Sanders campaign aide, Brent Welder, lost to lawyer Sharice Davids in his bid to oppose Republican Rep. Kevin Yoder in November.

Some items on the far-left agenda -- closing down the Immigration and Customs Enforcement agency, for example -- turned off many Democrats.

Other voters were undoubtedly hungry for candidates who could win a House seat in a purple or red district.

This is not to dismiss Ocasio-Cortez's considerable talents. She ran a brilliant campaign, both on social media and on the city pavements. And, unlike the movement-left professors dropping pearls of theory on the working masses, she actually comes from "the people." I hope she matures and drops movement politics like training wheels on a bicycle.

Nader played the genuine spoiler in 2000, but Sanders came outrageously close in 2016. Even after Hillary Clinton was strongly favored to become the nominee -- and Donald Trump became her likely opponent -- Sanders turned his biggest guns on Democrats.

During one primary debate, Sanders condemned Clinton in what he posed as a question: "Are you qualified to be President of the United States when you're raising millions of dollars from Wall Street, whose greed, recklessness and illegal behavior helped to destroy our economy?"

He considered appealing to the party's superdelegates to overturn the voters' choice and make him the nominee.

Then, to obtain concessions, he refused to endorse Clinton almost to the party's convention.

Trump picked up on Sanders' brutal critique and ran with it during the campaign. And small wonder Russian trolls working to elect Trump fired up tension between the Sanders movement and mainstream Democrats.

As for policy, there's often not a huge gap between far left and centrist Democrats. Most everyone wants Medicare for all. The difference is that the far-left wants to move everyone there tomorrow. The centrists would start by letting those just under the 65 age-of-eligibility buy into Medicare. That was Clinton's stance.

The gradual approach is probably the more effective way to get there because it doesn't scare the public with an overnight remake of health coverage. But Sanders insists on inserting the more controversial term "single payer" into Medicare for all.

At some point, so-called establishment Democrats should stop trying to win the far-left's love -- unwinnable because they are not part of the movement -- and tell them this: If you didn't come to ultimately work for the party, you entered the party's primaries for the wrong reason.

Terre Haute
Clear
76° wxIcon
Hi: 93° Lo: 74°
Feels Like: 76°
Robinson
Clear
77° wxIcon
Hi: 91° Lo: 72°
Feels Like: 78°
Indianapolis
Clear
75° wxIcon
Hi: 91° Lo: 74°
Feels Like: 75°
Rockville
Clear
72° wxIcon
Hi: 90° Lo: 73°
Feels Like: 72°
Casey
Clear
80° wxIcon
Hi: 89° Lo: 72°
Feels Like: 84°
Brazil
Clear
76° wxIcon
Hi: 91° Lo: 73°
Feels Like: 76°
Marshall
Clear
78° wxIcon
Hi: 92° Lo: 73°
Feels Like: 80°
Storms Possible
WTHI Planner
WTHI Temps
WTHI Radar

WTHI Events

 

Illinois Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 7 p.m. CT)

Confirmed Cases: 150554

Reported Deaths: 7309
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Cook934964664
Lake10104427
DuPage9454480
Kane7949280
Will7061322
Winnebago3131101
McHenry2179100
St. Clair2089143
Kankakee133565
Unassigned1170210
Rock Island109430
Madison107770
Kendall101122
Champaign99217
Boone62321
DeKalb59520
Peoria58329
Sangamon47333
Jackson34319
McLean29214
Randolph2917
Stephenson2806
Ogle2794
Clinton24417
Macon24122
LaSalle23717
Whiteside19915
Union19519
Grundy1855
Coles18417
Iroquois1685
Tazewell1588
Knox1490
Warren1470
Monroe14113
Adams1391
Cass1367
Williamson1344
Morgan1323
Jefferson11117
Lee1042
McDonough10415
Henry1031
Vermilion822
Pulaski790
Marion730
Macoupin613
Montgomery591
Perry591
Douglas540
Livingston532
Jo Daviess491
Christian474
Jasper477
Ford411
Woodford392
Jersey371
Franklin360
Bureau312
Menard260
Mercer250
Washington250
Cumberland240
Fayette243
Mason230
Wabash230
Alexander220
Carroll212
Johnson210
Piatt200
Effingham191
Hancock191
Moultrie190
Shelby191
Clark180
Crawford180
Logan180
Bond171
De Witt160
Edgar160
Fulton160
Massac150
Wayne151
Schuyler130
Marshall120
Brown100
Saline100
White90
Greene80
Henderson80
Lawrence80
Richland70
Hamilton60
Stark60
Pike50
Gallatin40
Clay20
Edwards20
Calhoun10
Hardin10
Out of IL10
Pope10
Putnam10
Scott10

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 8 p.m. ET)

Confirmed Cases: 49063

Reported Deaths: 2732
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Marion11760689
Lake5276246
Elkhart340255
Allen2835133
St. Joseph200169
Cass16429
Hamilton1608101
Hendricks1425100
Johnson1296118
Porter76738
Tippecanoe7359
Clark66844
Madison66764
Bartholomew59145
Vanderburgh5876
LaPorte58326
Howard58058
Kosciusko5624
Marshall5016
Noble48528
LaGrange4779
Jackson4733
Boone45443
Delaware45252
Hancock45236
Shelby43125
Floyd38444
Morgan32731
Monroe30928
Montgomery29720
Grant29626
Clinton2902
Dubois2886
Henry28216
White26610
Decatur25432
Lawrence24825
Dearborn23823
Vigo2388
Warrick22729
Harrison21622
Greene19032
Miami1862
Jennings17712
Putnam1708
DeKalb1634
Scott1628
Daviess14817
Wayne1436
Orange13623
Perry1359
Steuben1302
Franklin1268
Ripley1247
Jasper1232
Wabash1142
Carroll1102
Fayette1037
Newton9910
Gibson982
Whitley975
Starke943
Randolph804
Huntington782
Jefferson762
Wells751
Fulton721
Jay680
Washington671
Pulaski661
Knox640
Clay604
Rush583
Owen501
Adams491
Benton480
Posey450
Sullivan451
Spencer441
Brown421
Blackford392
Crawford320
Fountain322
Tipton311
Switzerland280
Parke240
Martin220
Ohio180
Vermillion140
Warren141
Union130
Pike110
Unassigned0193