BREAKING NEWS Penske reverses course, closes Indianapolis 500 to fans Full Story

Clapper: Trump's demand a 'disturbing assault'

Former Director of National Intelligence James Clapper says President Trump's call for the Justice Department to find out if the FBI spied on his campaign is "not good for the country."

Posted: May 22, 2018 4:48 AM
Updated: May 22, 2018 4:52 AM

On Sunday, President Donald Trump called on the Justice Department to open an internal investigation into whether the FBI placed an informant into his 2016 presidential campaign to spy on him. By Sunday night, Deputy Attorney General Rod Rosenstein had made clear that Justice would investigate whether any wrongdoing was found in the use of the informant, who, according to CNN sources, was never embedded in the campaign.

How solid is the ground Trump is treading on? What's the difference between a spy and an informant? And how does the FBI go about getting approval for an informant? I asked former FBI special agent Josh Campbell, a CNN contributor, all of these questions -- and more!

His answers, lightly edited for flow, are below.

Cillizza: Let's start basic. Why does the FBI use informants?

Campbell: Informants often serve as the backbone of important investigations, because they take the FBI into places they could never go on their own. If a special agent running a lawfully predicated criminal or counterintelligence investigation wants to learn more about what the targets of the investigation are up to, a logical investigative tool would be the use of an informant who could report back on the inner workings of a network.

While it would be difficult for an FBI special agent to walk into Trump Tower and glean on his or her own whether Russians were attempting to infiltrate the Trump campaign, a confidential informant -- with "placement" and "access," to use the terms of the trade -- could be extremely useful in helping mitigate potential threats to US national security.

Cillizza: What is the approval process -- if any -- for the FBI to get clearance to deploy an informant?

Campbell: While I can't get into specifics due to the sensitivities surrounding the use of human intelligence sources, I'll say from vast experience running informants domestically and overseas that this investigative tool is among the most highly scrutinized within the Department of Justice. Not only are there very specific guidelines surrounding the deployment of sources, each source operation is continually and meticulously reviewed in order to ensure the source is operating lawfully and does not present undue risk to the government.

It's also important to remember that investigations involving political officials receive even greater oversight as they fall within a category deemed Sensitive Investigative Matters, or SIMs. Understanding that certain segments of society -- politicians, the press, clergy, etc. -- should receive special protections in order to prevent any malfeasance on the part of aggressive investigators, operations involving SIMs would require high-level review and approval.

Cillizza: President Trump has cast this informant as a spy. What's the technical difference (if any) between those two terms and jobs?

Campbell: The President casting a human intelligence source as a "spy" is pure politics. Although informants and spies both technically gather information covertly, the word "informant" is generally reserved for someone righteously operating on behalf of law enforcement, whereas "spy" conjures up a more sinister mental picture of someone skulking in the shadows with questionable intentions.

It is interesting that the President's attorney, Rudy Giuliani, has frequently used the term "spy" as part of a coordinated campaign to discredit law enforcement officers investigating the campaign. Mr. Giuliani was once the US attorney in Manhattan, who oversaw countless government investigations utilizing confidential informants. I doubt he ever referred to them as "spies."

Cillizza: What's the danger in Congress knowing this person's identity?

Campbell: Congressional oversight of the US intelligence community has been enshrined in our way of life since the revelation of abuses of power by government agencies in the 1970s. Understanding government agencies should not be free to police themselves, congressional intelligence committees were formed to watch the watchers. Although agencies have been required to keep Congress fully informed of their operations, there has long been a norm that actual sources and methods were off-limits.

In extraordinary circumstances, I could envision government agencies briefing congressional leaders on their sources, but that would require a level of trust that has been lost since the infamous "Nunes memo," which many in government believe politicized the intelligence process by selectively releasing pieces of information for the purposes of painting a political narrative.

As someone who has sat across from individuals around the world, trying to persuade them to become government informants, I can tell you that the relationship between the government and a source is one based on trust. The government must trust the information the source provides will be accurate, and the source must trust that the government will protect his or her identity from disclosure. That the DOJ would refuse to provide Congress with information on a source because the agency fears it will be leaked, and thereby endangering the source, says a lot about the presently strained relationship between the Department of Justice and its congressional overseers.

Cillizza: Finish this sentence: "The likelihood this informant was placed in Trump's campaign as a way to spy on his operation is _________." Now, explain.

Campbell: "The likelihood this informant was placed in Trump's campaign as a way to spy on his operation is possible, but lawful."

First, it appears as though the FBI was conducting a properly predicated counterintelligence investigation in order to determine whether the government of Russia posed a threat to national security. We do not know whether the initial focus was on sussing out specific operatives from Russia, or on identifying members of the campaign who were already working on Russia's behalf.

Either way, the genesis of such a counterintelligence [operation] would have been scrutinized by the highest levels of the FBI and the Justice Department. Taking the step of using an intrusive investigative tool like a human informant would have garnered even greater oversight. In the face of blistering political attacks from the President, the public should find comfort knowing that the actions of DOJ officials under the Obama administration are now being defended by Justice Department officials appointed by Trump.

As a former FBI special agent, I often focus on what people don't say when offering a defense to allegations of potential wrongdoing. Although there appears to be no evidence to date that the President personally colluded with Russia, it remains interesting to me that the White House legal strategy involving this confidential human informant has been to attack what the informant did rather than what he may have found.

Terre Haute
Scattered Clouds
73° wxIcon
Hi: 75° Lo: 52°
Feels Like: 73°
Robinson
Broken Clouds
71° wxIcon
Hi: 73° Lo: 50°
Feels Like: 71°
Indianapolis
Broken Clouds
73° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 53°
Feels Like: 73°
Rockville
Broken Clouds
69° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 50°
Feels Like: 69°
Casey
Scattered Clouds
72° wxIcon
Hi: 73° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 72°
Brazil
Scattered Clouds
73° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 73°
Marshall
Scattered Clouds
73° wxIcon
Hi: 74° Lo: 51°
Feels Like: 73°
Comfortable Weather
WTHI Planner
WTHI Temps
WTHI Radar

Latest Video

Image

Tuesday Afternoon Weather

Image

Mystery seeds sent to Wabash Valley residents

Image

'So many of them said, I am proud to sign this,' Local organization puts out letter addressing hate

Image

Tuesday: Partly sunny, cool. High: 76

Image

Lance Rees

Image

ISU Football Quarantine

Image

West Vigo Football

Image

Northview Football

Image

THS Football

Image

THN FOOTBALL

WTHI Events

 

Illinois Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 7 p.m. CT)

Confirmed Cases: 184522

Reported Deaths: 7723
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Cook1072474897
Lake12089440
DuPage11558510
Kane9239298
Will8650339
Winnebago3688125
St. Clair3655156
McHenry2961114
Madison222273
Kankakee168668
Rock Island160531
Champaign154719
Unassigned1347197
Peoria134135
Kendall129123
Sangamon103733
DeKalb85029
Boone73523
Jackson65019
McLean57215
LaSalle56020
Macon48923
Adams4454
Randolph4357
Coles40119
Tazewell3888
Ogle3775
Clinton34917
Williamson3415
Stephenson3186
Whiteside31316
Union30321
Grundy2825
Monroe27813
Knox2621
Iroquois2497
Vermilion2152
Henry2071
Morgan2035
Cass20211
Jefferson19217
Warren1830
Lee1482
Montgomery1477
Bureau1442
Marion1380
Macoupin1373
Franklin1320
McDonough12815
Perry1261
Effingham1161
Christian1154
Jo Daviess1131
Saline1131
Douglas1022
Woodford983
Livingston922
Pulaski910
Logan860
Jersey701
Mercer700
Clark680
Shelby601
Fayette583
Washington580
White580
Bond572
Johnson570
Moultrie550
Jasper537
Wayne501
Menard480
Piatt480
Cumberland472
Carroll463
Gallatin450
Lawrence420
Mason420
Ford411
Alexander360
Hancock341
Massac340
Wabash320
De Witt300
Crawford290
Edgar260
Fulton260
Hamilton230
Marshall210
Greene200
Hardin170
Schuyler170
Clay140
Brown130
Edwards130
Pike130
Richland130
Scott110
Henderson90
Pope80
Putnam80
Calhoun70
Stark70
Out of IL00

Indiana Coronavirus Cases

(Widget updates once daily at 8 p.m. ET)

Confirmed Cases: 68433

Reported Deaths: 2980
CountyConfirmedDeaths
Marion14863719
Lake7101271
Elkhart459777
Allen3635158
St. Joseph315479
Hamilton2513104
Cass17519
Hendricks1750105
Vanderburgh172612
Johnson1652118
Porter119539
Tippecanoe110311
Clark108145
Madison84765
LaPorte83829
Kosciusko81912
Howard81065
Bartholomew74347
Marshall74222
Floyd69444
Monroe68630
Delaware63852
Noble63728
Boone63546
Dubois62612
Hancock62337
Jackson5524
LaGrange54210
Warrick51630
Shelby51126
Grant49629
Vigo47410
Dearborn46528
Morgan42532
Henry36118
Clinton3573
White34710
Montgomery34321
Lawrence32827
Wayne3179
Decatur31432
Harrison29422
Miami2582
Scott25010
Daviess24619
Greene23934
Franklin22410
DeKalb2224
Putnam2228
Jennings21012
Jasper2082
Gibson2004
Steuben2003
Ripley1887
Perry17212
Starke1657
Orange16424
Wabash1613
Posey1580
Fayette1557
Jefferson1492
Whitley1486
Fulton1462
Carroll1452
Wells1342
Knox1310
Huntington1183
Washington1161
Spencer1143
Newton11010
Tipton1075
Randolph1034
Clay975
Jay820
Adams812
Rush794
Owen781
Sullivan761
Pulaski721
Brown701
Fountain632
Benton600
Blackford532
Ohio514
Pike460
Parke451
Switzerland430
Crawford420
Martin420
Vermillion380
Union320
Warren191
Unassigned0200