• Photo
Former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, center, arrives at the Centre County Courthouse

Former Penn State University assistant football coach Jerry Sandusky, center, arrives at the Centre County Courthouse for a post-sentence motion in Bellefonte, Pa., Thursday, Jan. 10, 2013. (AP Photo/Gene J. Puskar)

  • More Featured Content
#OMG Oxford adds 'Tweet' to dictionary
#OMG Oxford adds 'Tweet' to dictionary

The Oxford English Dictionary is acknowledging that tweeting …

Teen rides whale shark in open water
Teen rides whale shark in open water

A 19-year old Florida teen doesn't think twice about jumping on…

Product review: Battling the 'Over the Hill' myth
Skin: Battling the 'Over the Hill' myth

Do you remember that whole line of “Over the Hill” birthday …

Simply Healthy: Apple White Grape Punch
Simply Healthy: Apple White Grape Punch

Pep up your morning with this vitamin-enriched drink! Fresh …

Obama's approval ratings take big hit
Obama's approval ratings take big hit

According to a recent poll, the number of Americans who think …

Advertisement

Jerry Sandusky's lawyers argue for new trial

Judge hears arguments on Sandusky trial fairness

Updated: Thursday, 10 Jan 2013, 12:10 PM EST
Published : Thursday, 10 Jan 2013, 6:52 AM EST

BELLEFONTE, Pa. (AP) — Jerry Sandusky's lawyers argued Thursday that he deserves a new trial because his defense lacked sufficient time to prepare for the first one, but the judge did not immediately rule after an hour-and-a-half hearing.

Attorneys for the former Penn State assistant football coach cited other alleged flaws in the trial, including that they were swamped by about 12,000 pages of documents and other materials, that Judge John Cleland should have instructed jurors about the years it took for victims to report he had abused them and that hearsay evidence was improperly allowed.

But prosecutors countered by showing most of the documents and records were not relevant to trial and got defense attorney Joe Amendola to admit that even after reviewing them after trial he did not find any that he would have used at trial.

Prosecutor Frank Fina told Cleland that the issue of "failure to report" by the victims was a major theme during the trial and was brought up during both parties' opening statements and closing arguments, and during cross-examination of the eight victims who testified against Sandusky.

He said Amendola's performance at trial, and his questioning of witnesses, are evidence that a fair trial took place even though the case moved from arrest to verdict in about eight months.

"He used everything he had to cross-examine these young men," Fina said.

Sandusky, 68, attended the hearing but played no active role in the proceedings. He briefly greeted his wife and supporters beforehand.

The former assistant football coach was convicted in June of 45 counts of child sexual abuse and is serving a 30- to 60-year sentence at a state prison about 200 miles away from the courthouse in Bellefonte. He has maintained his innocence.

Cleland did not indicate when he might rule. If Sandusky does not get a new trial — he is also asking to have charges thrown out entirely — he can then appeal to Superior Court, as he has indicated he plans to do.

Sandusky's arrest tarnished the university's vaunted football program and led to the firing of longtime coach Joe Paterno, who died nearly a year ago from lung cancer.

--------------------------------------------------------------------
Opinions that are derogatory, attack other users or are offensive in nature may be removed. WTHI is not responsible for the content posted in this comment section. We reserve the right to remove any offensive or off-topic remark or thread. To mark a comment for review by a moderator, click "Report Abuse."

 

 

comments powered by Disqus


Advertisement
  • Top 5 Trending on WTHITV.com
    No Stories Available
Advertisement